“To the creative community, the marketing community, this brings accountability and data-driven insight,” he says. “If you go to any marketing creative out there and you ask, ‘How did you come up with that, why did you use that word and not that word,’ they cannot actually answer.”
Hoo boy. That reminds me of the kid in high school English who argued that maybe Shakespeare really wasn’t intentionally putting his words and his stories together that way. Or the folks who insist that the green light in The Great Gatsby is definitely just an accidental choice. And the people who somehow read The Yellow Wallpaper and thought it was a story about interior decorating. As if great writers just happen upon brilliance. As if you can hack your way out of the work of writing.
Again, if I meet a writer who actually enjoys iterating on Google Ads copy ad nauseum, I’ll be shocked. We can all agree that in this instance, the AI-generated ad copy in the Chase example was better than the human-generated copy. My issue is the tech CEO thinking he can hack his way out of working with writers. What working writers can’t explain why they chose the words they did?
The answer: underpaid hacks.
Most of us have been an overworked, underpaid hack at some point. Writers who enjoy their creative work are happy to explain the nuances of every creative choice. Professional creators will bore you to tears with their explanations because they are so happy you finally asked.
Great content creators know why they chose every detail. So how do we change views of business leaders with the perception that we don’t know what we’re doing? As creators we have to foster these conversations about new technology, rather than dismissing them. Some suggestions for (understandably) reticent creatives:
For paid supporters only. Upgrade to access.
Become a paid supporter to read this content. Supporters can opt in to every issue of the newsletter and always have full access a growing library of essays and instructional guides. Supporters also ensure The Content Technologist's continued publication.